In
late 2013, A.O. Scott of the New York
Times wrote an article entitled “The Big Picture Strikes Back,” a piece I
considered to be one of the year’s best film-related articles. It was a thread
I had picked up on earlier in the year, and had been heavily considering as I
entered and exited various theaters throughout 2013. As usual, Scott knocked it
out of the park with his take, but I think the idea behind Cinema vs.
Television deserves enough space for a small-fry blogger such as myself to
offer his own thoughts on the subject.
So,
for this year, instead of posting my Top 10 list along with the usual little
blurb on each of the films, I thought I would take a broader approach and
discuss some of them in the context of this larger conversation that’s been
happening around film and television for the past few years. I’ve posted my Top
10 list below, but overall I won’t discuss every film on the list, and I might
also include discussion on some films that didn’t make my list, but that add to
the conversation.
* * *
As
most of my readers are aware, Breaking
Bad had it’s final eight-episode half-season run from August through September of last year, and pretty handily dominated the pop-culture landscape for those eight weeks, and deservingly so. The critical and commercial success of Breaking
Bad seemed to put somewhat of a period on a decade and a half of marvelous
television storytelling, which has given us everything from The Sopranos, to Lost, to Mad Men and of
course, The Wire.
Concurrently
with Breaking Bad’s final run, the
cinema had been pumping out its normal end-of-summer crapfest, with
big-budgeted gaudiness such as Neill Blomkamp’s misguided Elysium failing both critically and commercially. I had begun to think
that the best stories were being told on television, and moreover, that the
perceived limitations of the medium were actually in its favor, because the
episodic structure at least somewhat forces good writing, acting, and plot
development.
My
attitude changed somewhat, when five days after the finale of Breaking Bad, I went to see a little
film called Gravity (#7). Set in
space just outside of earth, filmmaker Alfonso Cuaron uses 3D technology and
weightless camera movement to achieve an overwhelming sense of imbalance and
vertigo. The emotional and spiritual
journey of Dr. Ryan Stone (Sandra Bullock) as she attempts to forge her way
back to earth after debris destroys her spaceship works seamlessly as a
thematic complement to the visual wizardry on display.
A gorgeous crane shot from All is Lost |
A
film that didn’t quite make my Top 10, director J.C. Chandor’s All is Lost, is probably another one of
the year’s best examples of a film that would not be successful in any other
medium. Set in the Indian Ocean, Robert Redford stars as an aging sailor who is
stranded at sea when his boat is damaged by a loose shipping container. The
one-man-act contains exactly one paragraph of spoken word, a monologue at the
beginning of the film. Like Gravity,
it is in many ways a stripped down film that forces introspection about coming
to terms with one’s own demise. How
lucky we are to have filmmakers brave enough to tackle these subjects in such
interesting and fully cinematic ways.
Relationships
were explored in new ways this year as well. A trio of films on my Top 10, Before Midnight (#2), The Place Beyond the Pines (#3), and To the Wonder (#9),
contemplate marriage, father-son relationships, and romance, respectively. Before Midnight is the third film in the
Before series by Richard Linklater,
each set nine years apart from one another. It is a rare treasure in cinema to
see characters change and grow over an 18-year period. Each of the three
chapters take place over mere hours and yet somehow successfully tell the story
of entire lives.
The Place Beyond the Pines, a film that
I regretfully never wrote a review of this year, has an interweaving three-act
structure involving fathers and sons that unfolds like a modern Dickens novel.
Derek Cianfrance, director of 2010’s Blue
Valentine, improves
on his solid rookie effort drastically, which successfully expresses
how legacy can beget both privilege and suppression. The two and a half hour
runtime only heightens the impact as Cianfrance peels back layer after
layer, until a core of thematic truth hits you like a pile of bricks in the
film’s final moments.
I
find it ironic that two inarguable cinematic masters tackled success and
failure in New York City this year – Martin Scorsese with the relentless The Wolf of Wall Street (#4) and the
Coen brothers with the slow-simmering Inside
Llewyn Davis (#5). These two stories could almost work as a double-feature
film, as both are centered around flat-out assholes for protagonists – one, an
imposturous but riotously successful Wall Street Banker, and the other a floundering
60’s folk singer whose devotion to his artistry is both his guiding star and
his Achilles heel. The storytelling
prowess of these two directors could propel them to success in just about any
medium, but the particular structures they operated in this year allowed them
to fully explore the circumstances of characters who manage to learn absolutely
nothing over the course of their story.
* * *
Finally,
I would be remiss to neglect mentioning 12
Years a Slave (#1) in the context of this discussion though I’ve already
dug into it thoroughly here. When I consider television shows I love, the first
aspect that comes to mind is characters. I think of Jerry Seinfeld, Don Draper,
Homer Simpson and Walter White. When I think of movies, however, imagery is the first thing that comes to
mind. I think of Janet Leigh’s screaming face in Psycho, and Anton Chigurh staring down a west-Texas gas station
owner in No Country for Old Men, and Kubrick’s
shuddering “star-child” at the conclusion of 2001: A Space Odyssey.
For
me, at least two images from 12 Years a
Slave belong in a conversation alongside some of the very best single shots
in film history. The first is an extended shot that I discussed in my review of
the film, which shows the main character, Solomon Northup, hanging from a tree
across a period of hours. This shot, and the movie in general, isn’t
particularly representative of the cinematic innovation I’ve been discussing
here, and yet, there is a modernity to it that I’m not sure America realized it
was ready for until director Steve McQueen showed us the way.
The single most memorable image for me from 2013 |
The
second shot, and the subtler of the two, comes about three quarters of the way through the
film. Standing in a field alone and slowly
looking around at nothing in particular, Northup stands left of center in the frame.
For a brief, breathtaking moment, Northup fixes his piercing gaze directly into
the camera, as though to say, “this is not the story of me – it is the story of
all of us.”
These
two shots, and a third – an extended close-up take in Gravity (pictured above) in which Sandra Bullock desperately attempts to stabilize
her oxygen use – will be the chief take-aways for my cinema experience this
year. I hope as television continues to tell great stories, film will continue
to find new ways to distinguish itself by innovating and surprising us.
The Top 10 Films of 2013
1. 12 Years a Slave
2. Before Midnight
3. The Place Beyond the Pines
4. The Wolf of Wall Street
5. Inside Llewyn Davis
6. Frances Ha
7. Gravity
8. Blue Jasmine
9. To the Wonder
10. Enough Said
Honorable Mentions (No
particular order):
Prisoners
Don Jon
Fruitvale Station
All is Lost
Nebraska
Short Term 12
Her
Spring Breakers
1 comment:
I always look forward to a pre-Oscar post by Adam Brown. Very well written, extremely intuitive, and thoughtful. Since I can't make it to the theater as often as I would like, I am always left to play the Netflix catch up. I am glad to have this list to give priority to the ones I plan to watch!
Post a Comment